The experiments summarized in this report are designed to develop data to support extension weed management recommendations for field corn, peanuts, sorghum, and soybeans. Additionally, these experiments demonstrate new and/or proven management practices to growers, county extension agents, agribusiness personnel, and other extension specialists.
Replicated experiments are established for specific needs and are located on university stations or private farms. The experiments are a joint effort of the University of Georgia extension faculty, county extension agents, cooperating research personnel, and cooperating growers. Commodity organizations and chemical companies provide financial support of these experiments.
This publication contains results of use patterns of herbicides, some of which may not be registered for the particular use. Such results are included for informational purposes only and should not be taken as recommendations for use. Additionally, the University of Georgia does not guarantee nor warrant the standards of the products, nor do they imply approval of the products to the exclusion of others which may be similarly effective.
The data in this report were analyzed using the Agricultural Research Manager –8.2.3 (ARM) computer program. All results are available in electronic format upon request.
Questions or comments concerning this report may be directed to the author:Dr. Eric P. Prostko
|CN-01-10||Weed Control in Field Corn with Corvus and Balance Flexx - I|
|CN-02-10||Weed Control in Field Corn with Corvus and Balance Flexx - II|
|CN-03-10||GR-Pigweed Control with HPPD Herbicides and No Atrazine|
|CN-04-10||Adding Prowl H20 to Common POST Treatments in Field Corn - I|
|CN-05-10||Adding Prowl H20 to Common POST Treatments in Field Corn - II|
|CN-07-10||Accent vs. Nic-It vs. Samson for Weed Control in Field Corn - I|
|CN-08-10||Accent vs. Nic-It vs. Samson for Weed Control in Field Corn - II|
|CN-12-10||Corn Insecticide Interactions with Resolve Q and Steadfast Q|
|CN-13-10||Balance Flexx, Corvus, Laudis, and Capreno Systems for Field Corn|
|CN-14-10||Laudis and Capreno in Field Corn|
|CN-15-10||Cadet Tank-Mixes For Weed Control in Field Corn|
|CN-16-10||Controlling RR Corn for Replanting|
|PE-01-10||Peanut Response to Ignite|
|PE-02-10||Does FL-07 Respond Differently to Peanut Herbicides?|
|PE-03-10||Weed Control in Peanut with POST Pyroxasulfone - I|
|PE-04-10||Weed Control in Peanut with POST Pyroxasulfone - II|
|PE-05-10||Peanut Tolerance to POST Applied Pyroxasulfone|
|PE-06-10||FL-07 Response to Gramoxone Inteon|
|PE-07-10||Tifguard Response to Gramoxone Inteon|
|PE-08-10||FL-07 Response to Classic|
|PE-09-10||Tifguard Response to Classic|
|PE-10-10||ET for POST Weed Control in Peanut|
|PE-11B-10||LPOST Applications of ET, Ultra Blazer, and Cobra for Palmer Amaranth Control|
|PE-12-10||ET vs. Gramoxone in Peanut|
|PE-13-10||POST Pyroxasulfone Combinations for Peanuts – Year 2|
|PE-15-10||Peanut Response to Direx|
|PE-16-10||Spartan Charge and Authority Assist for Weed Control in Peanut|
|PE-17-10||Sharpen for Weed Control in Peanut|
|PE-18-10||Day or Night Spraying of Herbicide/Fungicide Tank-Mixes|
|PE-19-10||Cadre, Dual Magnum, 2,4-DB, and Bravo WS Combinations|
|SG-01-10||Huskie, Sharpen, and Milo-Pro for Weed Control in Grain Sorghum|
|SB-01-10||GR-Palmer Amaranth Control Using the Liberty-Link System|
|SB-02-10||Tackle for Burndown and POST Weed Control in Soybeans|
|SB-03-10||What Does ET Do to GR-Palmer Amaranth?|
|SB-05-10||Dawn and Rhythm vs. Flexstar in Soybeans|
|SB-06-10||Dawn EPP and PRE Weed Control in Soybean|
|SB-07-10||Palmer Amaranth Control with Residual Systems|
|SB-08-10||Soybean Variety Response to Metribuzin Products – Year 2|
|SB-10-10||Weed Control in LL Soybeans - II|
|SB-14-10||Weed Control in Soybean with Fierce|
|SB-15-10||Authority MTZ and Authority Broadleaf for Weed Control in Soybean|
|SB-16-10||Cadet Tank-Mixes for Weed Control in Soybeans|
|SB-19-10||New Soybean Variety Response to Boundary|
|PIG-01-10||Paraquat Rates for Palmer Amaranth Control in WeedWiper|
|PIG-03-10||WeedWiper vs. WickMaster with Gramoxone Inteon for Palmer Amaranth Control|
|PIG-05-10||Ignite for Palmer Amaranth Control Using the WeedWiper|
|PIG-06-10||WeedWiper vs. LMC-Cross Wick Bar for Palmer Amaranth Control|
|PIG-07-10||WeedWiper vs. Top Crop Super Sponge for Palmer Amaranth Control|
|PRIM-01-10||Cutleaf Eveningprimrose Control with POST Peanut Herbicides in the Greenhouse|
|PRIM-02-10||Cutleaf Eveningprimrose Control with POST Peanut Herbicides in the Field|
Trade names are used only for information. The Cooperative Extension Service of The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences does not guarantee or warrant published standards on any product mentioned; neither does the use of a trade or brand name imply approval of any product to the exclusion of others which may also be suitable.
The Cooperative Extension Service of The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences offers educational programs, assistance, and materials to all people without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, or handicap status.
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8, and June 30, 1914, The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating.