Slide Presentation

TITLE    (click title to view slides)

AUTHOR
E. P. Prostko,R. C. Kemerait,T. L. Grey
University of Georgia
Tifton, GA

DOWNLOAD
• Slide Presentation (PowerPoint, 1.0 MB)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
  1. Cadre/Fungicide Tank-Mixes in Peanut
  2. Cadre in Peanuts
  3. Cadre Use in Georgia Peanuts
  4. Cadre Tank-Mixes
  5. Which one?
  6. Objective
  7. Materials and Methods: 2001-2002
  8. Results - Crop Injury
  9. Peanut response to Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2001.
  10. Peanut response to Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2002 (26 DAT).
  11. Results - Weed Control
  12. Nutsedge control with Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2001.
  13. Nutsedge control with Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2002 (19 DAT).
  14. Texas panicum control with Cadre/ fungicide tank-mixes, 2001 (40 DAT).
  15. Texas panicum control with Cadre/ fungicide tank-mixes, 2002 (67 DAT) .
  16. Smallflower morninggglory control with Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2002.
  17. Sicklepod control with Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2002.
  18. Summary



SLIDE CONTENTS
  1. Cadre/Fungicide Tank-Mixes in Peanut E. P. Prostko, R. C. Kemerait, and T. L. Grey University of Georgia Tifton
  2. Cadre in Peanuts discovered (1981) field tested (1989) EUPís (1993-95) labeled (1996) excellent control of nutsedge complex G-E control of many other species 2002 price reduction 18 Month Cotton Rotation
  3. Cadre Use in Georgia Peanuts Acres Treated Source: UGA Extension Agent Surveys
  4. Cadre Tank-Mixes
  5. Objective To evaluate the influence of fungicides,applied in combination with Cadre (imazapic), on crop and weed response in peanuts.
  6. Materials and Methods 2001-2002 small plot techniques 3-4 replications Georgia Green Cadre 1.44 ozs/A + NIS @ 0.25% v/v Applied 30 DAP Bravo WS, Tilt, Headline, Abound, Folicur, Moncut crop/weed response
  7. Results -Crop Injury
  8. Peanut response to Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2001. 6 DAT (LSD 0.05 = 4) 22 DAT (LSD 0.05 = 7)
  9. Peanut response to Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2002 (26 DAT). LSD 0.05 = 8
  10. Results - Weed Control
  11. Nutsedge control with Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2001. 22 DAT (LSD 0.05 = 5) 40 DAT (LSD 0.05 = 1)
  12. Nutsedge control with Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2002 (19 DAT). LSD 0.05 = 9
  13. Texas panicum control with Cadre/ fungicide tank-mixes, 2001 (40 DAT). LSD 0.05 = 13
  14. Texas panicum control with Cadre/ fungicide tank-mixes, 2002 (67 DAT) . LSD 0.05 = 20
  15. Smallflower morninggglory control with Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2002 . 19 DAT (LSD 0.05 = 16) 67 DAT (LSD 0.05 = 1)
  16. Sicklepod control with Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2002 . 19 DAT (LSD 0.05 = 12) 67 DAT (LSD 0.05 = 5)
  17. Summary no physical compatibility problems no significant increases in crop injury no significant reductions in weed control